BULLETIN

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH PHYSICIANS

“THE VOICE OF PUBLIC HEALTH PHYSICIANS, GUARDIANS OF THE PUBLIC’S HEALTH”

 

Volume 49, Issue 2                                                                                               NOVEMBER, 2003


Table of Contents:

 

Fall Meeting Program…...1

President’s Message……. 2

Spring Meeting Minutes...3

Abstracts 2/21/03………...5

AMA Report……………..5

Adolescent Health……….6

Liaison Activities………...7

Single Payer……………. .8

AAPHP Leadership…….10

 

***********************

     

 

 Fall Membership Meeting

 

       Moscone Center  Room 250

         San Francisco, California

           NOVEMBER 16, 2003

                                                                      

                 PROGRAM

BUSINESS MEETING - 8:30–11:30AM

8:30 – 10:00AM

Call to Order

Introductions

Review of Minutes of February 2003 Annual Meeting

Informational Reports:

President

         Overview & Special Issues

 President- Elect

        CPT

         AMA Delegation Report

Vice President

          Programs

 

Treasurer

           Budget

Membership

Special Committees & Initiatives:

             Education & Training

             Health Care Access

             History & Archives           

*50th Anniversary & Awards

 

 

10:00 – 10:15AM  Break

 

10:1511:30AM

Additional Liaison Reports and Action Items

            AMA Proposed Resolutions

            ACPM Relationship

            Job Market Initiative (JMI)

            CDC “White Paper” Update

            NACCHO

            NCCHC

            Service Contract Proposals           

Old Business

New Business

 

11:30AM

Adjournment

EDUCATIONAL SESSION  2:30 – 6:30PM

 

 2:30 - 4:30 PM  

 Panel on Public Health Law

 

Moderator: Kathleen Acree, MD, JD

Panelists:

Edward Richards, JD

Harvey A. Peltier Prof. of Law

Director, Program in Law,

   Science and Public Health

Paul M. Herbert Law Center

Louisiana State University

 

Robert England, MD, MPH

Chief of Epidemiology

Arizona Department of Health Services

 

Jonathan Weisbuch, MD, MPH

Director Maricopa County Dept. of Public Health

Phoenix, Arizona

 

Georges Benjamin, MD

Executive Director APHA (Invited)

 

    4:30 – 5:00PM  Break

 

    5:00 - 6:30 PM  

Single Payer Health System

Bree Johnston, MD, MPH

California Physicians Alliance Board Co-President

State Chapter of Physicians for a National Health Plan                                  

 

    6:30 PM               

  Adjournment

              or

                                       

    6:30 – 7:00 PM   

   Additional Business, if needed

              

President’s Message

 

   Mary Ellen Bradshaw, MD

 

Since our last AAPHP Bulletin in February, we have found ourselves in a totally changed national status – engaged in yet another war which looks like it will continue for some time – facing a budget for health and social needs severely compromised by heavy tax cuts  and a down-turning economy – increased homelessness, joblessness, epidemics of SARS and spreading West Nile Virus – and the enhanced threat of terrorism – bio, chemo and nuclear – the latter  stirred up by our invasion of Iraq. The numbers of those without health insurance continue to mount with no reasonable solution being seriously considered. The environment and the air we breathe is under unrelenting attack. Researchers involved with grants studying  HIV and teen pregnancy/sexuality are being investigated. I could go on. It is not a happy state that has evolved. With it have come several issues facing our members in leadership positions in city, county and state departments of health and at the federal level. Issues related to Bioterrorism, Home Land Security and their authority as Public Health Physicians under the law. Issues related to lack of resources as local and state coffers run dry. Issues related to the health and well-being of the communities for which they have responsibility in the face of no or inadequate health insurance.

 

It is in response to these challenges that AAPHP has developed our Educational Session at the Fall General Meeting on Sunday afternoon, November 16, 2003 at the Moscone Center, Room 250, San Francisco, California. Included in this session will be a Panel on Public Health Law featuring, Edward Richards, JD, Director, Program in Law, Science and Public Health, Paul M. Herbert Law Center at Louisiana State University and at least two Public Health Physicians at the helm in county and state health departments - Robert England, MD., MPH, Chief of Epidemiology, Arizona Department of Health Services and Jonathan B. Weisbuch, Health Officer and Medical Director, Maricopa Department of Health, Phoenix . Following will be a discussion on Single Payer Health Plan with  Bree Johnston, MD, MPH, a representative from Physicians for a National Health Plan (PNHP). These two components promise an extremely informative session, pertinent to current pressing public health issues for AAPHP members. Plan on attending and having your voice heard.

 

 During these past several months, AAPHP has been represented in a number of activities including the Preventive Medicine Leadership Forum (which AAPHP chaired through February, 2003), AMA President’s Forum, CPT Code Task Force, all attended by Dr. Arvind Goyal,; AMA Committee On Organization (COO) meetings attended by Drs. Bradshaw, Goyal and Weisbuch; AMA HOD, at which, as a result of an emergency,  Dr. Goyal stood in for the usual delegate, presenting AAPHP resolutions and participating in a meeting extremely supportive of Public Health; NACCHO-ASTHO attended by Dr. Weisbuch, and NCCHC, attended by Drs. Mack and Weisbuch with Drs. Bradshaw and Barth manning the AAPHP Exhibit. Dr. John Poundstone participated in the review of the soon-to-be published AMA Obesity Guidelines. This latter came as a special request to AAPHP representing public health at AMA. In addition, AAPHP has been in dialogue with CDC regarding the “White Paper” written by Dr. Joel Nitzkin suggesting changes in the internal structure of CDC. The highly successful Job Market Initiative (JMI) developed  by Dr. Nitzkin and supported by Dr. Kim Buttery, AAPHP Webmaster, continues with some reductions in postings and is facing a crossroads in future viability.

 

Included in this Bulletin, is a summary of the Spring Annual Meeting in San Diego,  at which we elected new officers, reports of the NACCHO-ASTHO and NCCHC meetings ;the AMA National Coalition on Adolescent Health and the new ACPM Task Force on Adolescent Health as well as the AMA Annual Meeting in June, 2003. During the months ahead, we anticipate bringing resolutions to the AMA on Single Payer, Concern about Congressional intervention in HIV and teen sexuality grants and supporting issues brought forth by our colleagues at ACPM on Reauthorization and Strengthening of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and Environmental and Policy Interventions to Promote Physical Activity Exercise. We are also exploring proposals aimed at closer collaborations with ACPM.

 

The big event for AAPHP will be our 50th Anniversary Celebration at the Annual Membership Meeting in February 2004 in Orlando, Florida during the Prevention 2004 meeting.. All members have been requested to make a voluntary contribution of fifty dollars towards this event with their membership renewal. Following our usual Business Meeting during which we will hold elections, we plan an Educational Session and a Reception honoring long -standing members of AAPHP who have contributed so much to the betterment of Public Health. Nominations are being requested to determine who will be honored as the most out-standing. Honorees will be requested to offer reflections and words of wisdom on where we’ve been and where we should be going in 21st Century Public Health. . Nominations with CV’s are requested to Dr. Bradshaw, MEBMD@aol.com before December 15, 2003. A 50 year History Review and Compendium of AAPHP policies are expected to be completed and ready by this meeting. Much has been accomplished by our Association in this past half century, and we are optimistic about our role in these very challenging years ahead.

 

Come join us at both events, follow the plans on our website, http://www..aaphp.org … and bring along another potential member.

 

Given the continuing and mounting challenges to Public Health and its practitioners on the front lines - you, our AAPHP members and your colleagues - it seems that more than ever, we need to come together to have our voices as Public Health Physicians heard and our positions made known in every appropriate forum. Your past contributions and involvement are greatly appreciated and cannot be overestimated, but it is critical that you remain involved with the only organization that represents you, the Public Health Physician, and encourage others to join us. There is “ strength in numbers“ and the resources membership provides can help AAPHP to accomplish more each year

 

 

   Spring Membership

            Meeting

       San Diego, CA

     February 21, 2003

 

    Summary of Minutes

 

The Spring Meeting took place in San Diego, California on February 21, 2003 ,  scheduled  from 1:30PM-7:00PM with continued discussion until 8:30PM. The first portion of the meeting from 1:30PM-3:30PM ,the Educational Session, began with  a brief presentation on the History and Mission of AAPHP by Mary Ellen Bradshaw, MD, AAPHP President. Key points :AAPHP will have its 50th birthday in February of 2004; AAPHP started as an organization of physician directors of state and local health departments to provide leadership at the national level; relationships with AMA and APHA have been strong since the beginning.

 

A Panel Discussion followed, addressing two major topics. “Public Health Program Implementation: A Proposal to CDC- A White Paper” was presented  by Joel Nitzkin,MD, MPH, Past President of AAPHP and former Director, Louisiana Department of Health, with response from James R. Allen, MD, MPH, Director, Division of Chronic Disease and Tobacco Control, Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Past Director of HIV Program at CDC, AMA Vice President for Science and Director, Arizona Department of Health. “A Rare Public Health Dilemma: Lethal Naeglaria fowleri in a Local Water System – A Case Presentation” was done by Jonathan Weisbuch, MD, MPH, Director & Chief Medical Officer, Maricopa County Department of Public Health and a member of the AAPHP BOT. Comments were provided by James Haughton, MD, MPH, Associate Director, Division of Public Health, Los Angeles County Department of Health Services. Active discussion with meeting attendees followed with recommendations to modify the “White Paper” and ultimately, publish both presentations.( Abstracts of both were included in the February 2003 Bulletin and repeated following these minutes).

 

After a refreshment break, the Business Meeting was convened by Dr. Bradshaw at approximately 4:30PM. Minutes of the Fall Meeting 11/10/02 were reviewed and accepted. Reports of the AAPHP Executive Committee and Board of Trustees followed. Dr. Bradshaw presented a special Award for Outstanding Service to Dr. Marcel Salive on the completion of his last term on the BOT, and appointed him as AAPHP liaison to the Commissioned Officers Association (COA) and as such, a guest on the BOT. She mentioned  a number of AAPHP accomplishments during the past six months which have been detailed in the February Bulletin, including the Preventive Medicine Leadership Forum which AAPHP chaired in 2003 and participation in the celebratory event, hosted by the COA and the USPHS in Washington, DC welcoming the Surgeon General. In reviewing the various reports, Dr. Bradshaw suggested that AAPHP needed a planning budget to be developed by the Finance Committee and approved by the BOT to be presented to the Annual Membership meeting for comment and potential modification. A motion to this effect was made and unanimously approved. The current budget report was unanimously approved.

 

Dr. Bradshaw gave highlights from the the AMA Delegation Report from the I-02 meeting in New Orleans, included in detail in the February Bulletin. She commented on an excellent presentation and report on disparities in health care, a priority  interest for AMA. Results of a survey of physicians indicating public health as a high priority was shared at the Section Council on Preventive Medicine.

 

A major undertaking of the AMA is the Committee on Organization of Organizations (COO) formed in response to a directive of the HOD to re-evaluate the structure and funding of the AMA and come up with a business plan based on the outcome, Two or three meetings are scheduled with the association representatives casting votes for the preferred structure. Drs. Bradshaw, Goyal and Weisbuch attended the first meeting in Los Angeles. A summary of the highlights of that meeting was shared with request for feedback from the membership regarding the options -  individual membership only, organizational membership only, or a combination of both with funding based on the structure. A motion was made and carried to support the process and the delegates in making the appropriate decision at the time of the vote.

 

Committee Reports:

 

By-Laws Committee:

Dr. Goyal, Chair, presented a document with the several By-Laws changes, some significant, others editorial as recommended by the Committee. With some minor  adjustments, the By-Laws changes were approved by the membership. The document includes rule changes for General Membership meetings, actions of the Executive Committee, unfilled terms, committee appointments, the executive manager, the payment and timing of dues and the type of notice for amendments to the By-laws.

The Revised By-laws will be made available on the website.

 

Dues

As amended in the By-Laws, the annual membership dues shall be presented by the Board at the last General Membership Meeting of a calendar year. The dues statement each year will be mailed before the end of the preceding year. 2003 dues increase to $75 for regular membership and $700 for life membership were approved by unanimous vote and will include a request for $50 contribution to the 50th anniversary  celebration in February, 2004. Dues were stabilized for 2004 at this rate by unanimous vote.

Health Access Committee

Dr,. Rumm proposed that AAPHP meet with both party congressional leaders or staff before the next Annual meeting as there are contacts there that have expressed an interest in meeting with us.

 

Nominations Committee:

The following slate of candidates for office was presented to the membership and elected unanimously;

Arvind Goyal, MD, MPH, President-Elect (2003-2004); Alfio Rausa, MD, MPH – Vice President (2003-2004)(Peter D. Rumm, MD, MPH withdrew his name at the meeting due to other commitments)

New Board of Trustees members: Timothy  P. Barth, MD, CCHP (2003-2006); Joshua Lipsman, MD, MPH (2003-2006) and Perrianne Lourie, MD, MPH (2003-2004) completing the final term of Tisha Dowe, MD, MPH, who resigned from the BOT. Continuing BOT members: Sindy Paul, MD, MPH (2003-2006) (1st full term); Stan Reedy, MD, MPH (2003-2006) (1st full term); Elizabeth S. Safran, MD,MPH (2003-2006) (2nd term).

 

Membership Committee

Dr. Goyal, Chair, focused on the mechanisms to support and expand membership with reference to AAPHP’s contract relationship with NCCHC and requested what the membership thought should be included in any contract for support/staff services. Responses included basic minimums needed in a contract and/or need to be done by AAPHP:

  • Signatures on the contract with NCCHC
  • Commitment and support to our organization
  • Basic organizational and personal information on dues statements
  • Support of initiatives, i.e., the Job Market
  • Attendance at general membership meetings and publicity for the organization
  • Meetings minutes in a professional manner
  • Balance the number of meetings vs. the support
  • Scheduling of meetings and telephone conferences around the professional workforce
  • Focus on recruitment and communication
  • Handling of incoming contacts to the organization
  • Help us learn to sell the organization and focus on priorities

 These were in addition to the concept of having a home base with address, phone and fax. The current contract with NCCHC is for $400 per month.

There followed a discussion of the NCCHC contract and the AAPHP roles and workload. Dr. Marc Safran proposed that we move to every other month executive committee meetings and every other month board meetings. Dr. Doug Mack seconded the motion. The group expressed that AAPHP was too small to have such an extensive agenda. Dr. Goyal offered an amendment to state there would be no board or executive committee meetings in the months we have general membership meetings. Discussion continued as to the disparity between the resources of the organization and the workload. Motion passed with two negative votes.

 

A motion made to allocate $200 to upgrade the quality of our home page, passed unanimously.

 

Training and Certification Committee:

Drs. Nitzkin and Weisbuch made report. Multiple options were discussed. The proposal that seemed most promising was a monthly or other periodic telephone conference call CME sessions relevant to public health practice. Dr. Acree described the California system designed along these lines and indicated that she would check as to possible extension of her program for AAPHP.

There was consensus that AAPHP provide or arrange CME training hours. The most practical way might be to identify currently available educational offerings. This issue might be explored through NCCHC staff. The goal would be to offer CME relevant to public health practice. It was suggested that AAPHP consider becoming certified to offer CME credit. This is substantial work, as per Dr. Art Liang. We would need to go to ACCME to apply for such certification – a difficult and expensive process. Dr. Acree will check on what her system can tolerate and how many people it could accommodate..Dr. Liang will check CDC resources that might be of value to us.

 

The meeting was adjourned by Dr. Bradshaw at 8:30PM.

 

Minutes prepared by Drs. Joel Nitzkin and Peter Rumm

(Modified and expanded by Dr. Bradshaw)

 

 

(Reprinted from the February 2003 Bulletin)

Educational Session  2/21/03 Abstracts- 

Public Health Program Implementation Initiative

 

This proposal is a recommendation from AAPHP to CDC to initiate a new research agenda and a new initiative to improve the performance, leadership capacity and emergency preparedness capabilities of state and local health departments.

This initiative would address two sets of issues:
1.   Policy/politics and  organizational culture within professional and governmental agencies as they relate to the roles and leadership capabilities of state and local health departments.
2.    Decision-support modeling and statistical issues (
GIS template and new approach to p value) to optimize program planning, implementation and evaluation

    The initial research could be completed in three to five years at a cost not to exceed $1 million per year   to the stage where nationwide implementation could begin, as subsidiary research continues to work out selected details and develop additional decision-support modules.
Addressing the second of the two sets of issues within CDC could improve the performance of CDC-funded  programming, nationwide.

If  AAPHP is correct in its assessment of the root causes of lackluster performance by state and local health departments   the stage will be set for quantum improvements in the  performance and leadership capabilities  of state and local health departments within the three to five years  immediately following completion of the initial research.

 

Naeglaria Case Presentation

In October of 2002, in the Peoria region of Maricopa County, Arizona, two  children died on the same day from the same amebic meningitis infection, primary amebic meningoencephalitis

 

This very rare infection by the ameoba, Naeglaria fowleri, was unusual in many respects.  None of the usual causal factors seemed to apply; the children had no history of swimming in lakes or ponds, no common exposure to sources of water spray, and neither had any history of having traveled to areas of the country where the organism is more common than Arizona which has recorded only six cases in the past two decades.  The two children had no common contact or association with each other than the deep-well, non-chlorinated water system they shared.  The water system, which serves 6000 individuals, is privately run.  Its  water sample records filed with the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department had shown no evidence of coliform contamination in the previous two years. 

The investigation of the clinical findings, the epidemiologic investigation, and the in depth analysis of the local water system shared by these two victims and their community is a classic public health analysis raising several concerns for the era of bioterrorism.  Was the event intentional?  Was the management of the public panic and concern carried out correctly?
Is the entire deep water aquifer system at risk to natural or intentional infection by parasites for which no standard testing is done, nor most labs equipped to handle?  What are the implications for other deep wells currently allowed to provide non-chlorinated water to thousands and possibly millions of people around the world?
These questions and others related to the current problems in the public health infrastructure and its implications for future massive biologic events were discussed.
   

 

************************

 

AMA Annual HOD Report                     

    Chicago, June 2003

 

I was honored to have been asked to sit in as a delegate representing the AAPHP at this meeting, pinchhitting for Drs Weisbuch and Bradshaw who have been the voices of reason on behalf of Public Health in the AMA house for several years. The items of special interest included:

 

1.Elections:

John C. Nelson MD,MPH of Utah was chosen as President -Elect of the AMA in a close race. Nancy H. Nielson, MD, PhD was elected Speaker  and Jeremy A. Lazarus, MD as Vice Speaker of the House of Delegates.

 

2. AAPHP Resolutions:

 Based on our resolution  #437, “Betterment of Public Health” the AMA reaffirmed that the betterment of the public's health is our highest goal and that our efforts...reflect that value.

Another of our resolutions #438, “Public Health Leadership”, lead the AMA to affirm that public health practice was indeed the practice of medicine and to reaffirm that appropriately public health trained and experienced, licensed physicians be employed in leadership positions by state health departments.

AAPHP re-submitted Resolution #424 “Epidemiology of Firearm Injuries” requiring that the AMA: strongly urge the Administration and Congress to encourage the CDC to conduct epidemiological analysis of the data on firearm -related injuries and deaths and to provide the CDC with sufficient resources to both do the analysis and provide reports to Congress and the nation through a broadly disseminated document ; and assist in convening a broad-based coalition to thoroughly examine the issue of gun-related violence from a public health perspective,  was adopted.

 

3.Resolutions co-sponsored by AAPHP, ACPM and Addiction Medicine #423, “Tobacco Advertising Aimed at Gay and Lesbian Community” and #434, “Support for Federal Interagency Committee on Smoking and Health Report” were adopted.

Resolution #219 co-sponsored with ACPM, “Elevating Health Concerns in International Trade Agreements” pertaining to public health considerations prior to signing of

International Trade Agreements was referred to the BOT for decision/action.

 

4. Other public health related resolutions involving reducing the risk of flight related DVT, tax free

tobacco products ,guidelines to return to work after injury or illness,and labelling and promotion of alcoholic beverages were referred to the AMA Board for decision/action.

5. Several other tobacco related resolutions including AMA  support for FCTC were approved. Opposition to "securitization" of Tobacco settlement funds was referred to the AMA Board. A policy asking for removal of Tobacco Products from pharmacies was reaffirmed.

 

Respectfully submitted,

Arvind K Goyal MD,MPH

President- Elect, AAPHP

 (Amended by Editor)

 

****************************

Adolescent Health Activities

 

AMA National Coalition on Adolescent Health

 

The AMA National Coalition on Adolescent Health met again in Washington, DC, on May 16th, 2003. The Coalition is made up of twenty national organizations, including AAPHP, and meets twice a year “ to advance its mission to promote physician advocacy for education, policy and research related to the improvement of adolescent health; contribute to the achievement of Healthy People 2010’s 21 critical adolescent objectives; address adolescent racial/ethnic disparities; support adolescent organizational policy development; and promote collaboration among physician professional associations”.

 

The Agenda for the May 16th meeting covered presentations by Mary Tierney, MD, MPH of the American Institutes for Research; HRSA Bulling Project Update by Stephanie Bryn, MPH MCHB accompanied by handouts on “Relationships Between Bullying and Violence Among US Youth”, an article from DHHS NICHD in April 2003 Archives of  Pediatric Adolescent  Medicine, and “Bullying Behaviors Among US Youth” in the April 25,2001 issue of JAMA; Future of Medicaid and S-Chip by Madlyn Morreale, MPH,CAHL with an accompanying booklet on “Enrolling Children and Families in Health Coverage: The Promise of Doing More” from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities of the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, June 2002.; HIPPA Implementation by Abigail English, JD, CAHL with a publication on “Protecting Minors’ Health Information Under the Federal Medical Privacy Regulations” from The ACLU Foundation Reproductive Freedom Project, 2003.

 

The morning session was followed by an Educational Forum on Adolescent Health featuring a panel on “Nutrition and Physical Activity”. Speakers included Leslie Lytle, PhD, RD, Professor at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health; George Graham, PhD, President of the National Association of Sports and Physical Education and a Professor at Penn State University ; Victor Medrano of VERB -  Its What You Do Youth Media Campaign at Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and Bonnie Spear, PhD, RD, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Division of  Adolescent Medicine, University of Alabama – Birmingham. There were several excellent handouts including “Eat Well and Keep Moving” and “Planet Health” from Human Kinetics; National Initiative to Improve Adolescent Health by the Year 2010 from Healthy People 2010; “The AFP Guide to Teen Tobacco Use and Prevention” co-sponsored by IL AFP, Family Practice Education Network, AAP, IL chapter of AAP and IL Dept of Public Health; and “The Health of America’s Middle Childhood Population”  by  The Public Policy Analysis & Education Center for Middle Childhood & Adolescent Health at the School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

The next meeting of the Coalition will take place in November  2003 in Washington, DC.

Preventive Medicine Coalition on Adolescent Health

 

The American College of Preventive Medicine launched its  Coalition on Adolescent Health with a half-day in-person meeting in Washington, DC on Monday afternoon, June 23, 2003. There are sixteen national organizations, including AAPHP, as members of the Coalition. The formation of the Coalition is one of several objectives the ACPM has included as part of “ a four-year project to strengthen its organizational commitment to adolescent health issues and to improve the ability of ACPM Members, other health professionals, and health systems to apply the tools of population medicine and clinical prevention to adolescent health problems”.

 

 ACPM has taken as a focus “ the problems of sexual activity during adolescence, obesity, substance abuse (with a special emphasis on alcohol use) and violence prevention”.

 

The purpose of the first meeting was to “1) exchange information about each organization’s adolescent health activities , emphasizing ways that other Coalition members might participate in those activities; 2) To determine a framework for an action-oriented plan to apply the Coalition’s collective expertise and influence on emerging policy issues in adolescent health and prevention.”. A mission, objectives and a series of specific action steps for the next 12 months.were to be defined  during the meeting. A Discussion Question outline on the role of the Preventive Medicine Adolescent Health Coalition and a “Domain of Influence” matrix facilitated the achievement of the meeting goals.

 

In addition to exchanges of organizational information, there were presentations on “Nutritional and Physical Activity Health Policies: NANA by Margo Wootan, CSPI and “Adolescent Sexual Health: Behaviors and Health Outcomes” by Susan Wang, CDC. “Critical Objectives for Adolescents and Young Adults” from Healthy People 2010 was made available as were several papers from the National Alliance for Nutrition and Activity (NANA) including “Obesity and Other Diet- and Inactivity-Related Diseases: National Impact and Cost”; “Adult Diseases in Children”; “Child Nutrition Program Reauthorization Recommendations”; Policy Recommendations for Transportation and Health”. A compilation “Research Articles: Adolescent Sexual Health “was prepared as a handout by ACPM.

 

A future meeting of the Consortium will be held in mid-2004.

 

. 

Liaison Activities

Jonathan Weisbuch, MD, MPH

 

Recently, Maricopa County, Arizona has witnessed several significant public health events that deserve mention.  This central region of Arizona, with Phoenix, Scottsdale, Mesa and Tempe, and 3,200,000 mostly immigrants from the north and the south, played host to the United States Surgeon General’s Conference for the Uniformed Officer Corps of the Public Health Service, the combined annual  meeting of the National Association of Counties and City Health Officials (NACCHO) and the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO), and the Arizona Public Health Association (AzPHA).  Nearly 1000 uniformed public health service officers spent three days in Scottsdale with Dr. Carmona, the Surgeon General, hearing about preparedness in public health, the successes of the USPHS with SARS and WNV, and the concerns for future outbreaks like influenza and smallpox.  Another  1500 attendees at the NACCHO/ASTHO  meeting in September heard many of the same messages, but from different speakers and with a different orientation.

 

The NACCHO/ASTHO meeting featured George A. Straite, Jr./ the Assistant Vice Chancellor, Office of Public Affairs at UC Berkeley as the keynote speaker.  He wove a story from the events of last spring and summer, when Berkeley chose to limit the Asian student summer program for fear of SARS into a what might have occurred had the disease struck the campus.  The transition from fact to might-have-been was so smooth that most in the audience failed to recognize it, and were carried forward into a possible future of multiple deaths, a press out of control and a university and a city in panic.  His message, we are still not fully prepared for the unthinkable, was profound.  It served as an excellent introduction to the many formal and informal sessions that followed in the next three days.  Former CDC Director, William Foege, spoke on Wednesday, bringing down the house.  His message, that we are all members of one club, the government of the United States, that our work in public health is at the heart of the social justice principles upon which this nation was founded, and that our continuing efforts to strengthen the public health infrastructure with the new resources provided since 9/11 may be a major factor in the prevention of the biologic catastrophes which seem just beyond the horizon. 

 

On Thursday, Secretary Thompson spoke about the importance of public health, his commitment to continue the funding, and his continuing support for the work of all public health professionals in preparing the society and the public health system for extraordinary events.  His message, if acted upon by the administration and the Congress would be a continuing benefit to our profession and would make up for the twenty years of diminished support for public health from Washington.  Dr. Gerberding, the present Director of CDC, continued the message on Friday speaking for continued support for Frist-Kennedy monies and the promotion of the public health system.  She also met with several PH Directors from the large metropolitan areas listening to our concerns that CDC should be cognizant of the unique concerns of major urban areas that often conflict with the issues promoted by the states.  We asked her to consider direct lines of communication and funding to the urban centers akin to the relationship CDC has with NYC, Los Angeles, and Chicago.  On Friday afternoon, Dr. Gerberding met with the Director and Division Directors of the Maricopa County Department of Health in an effort to hear how the local folks were dealing with the many problems confronting us.  She was interested in more than the bio-defense issues, and she was not dissatisfied.  As Dr. Gerberding travels about the country she makes an effort to meet with the local health officials to learn how the grass roots are taking hold in this new era.

 

In late September, the Arizona Public Health Association met in Phoenix to many of the same themes as the previous two meetings.  The presentations were excellent, and the attendance was high for a state convention.  Public Health is alive and well in Arizona at the local level, at the state level and at the federal level.  The new resources have been a great boon to all of us, but more important that the money is the dedication by all who are involved.  We are all seeing new professionals showing interest in public health, and long term practitioners rejuvenated, and remembering their enthusiasm and commitment when they began their careers in what now seems the distant past. 

 

When we meet in San Francisco, in just a few weeks, AAPHP will bring more information to the table.  We look forward to seeing as many of you as possible at our meetings on Sunday, November 16, both before and after the opening session of the APHA Convention

 

Comments from Correctional Health, the flip side of Public Health

 

The American Association of Public Health Physicians is a long term member of the Board of Trustees of the National Center for Correctional Health Care, the major national organization that has developed standards for correctional health care and accredits over 500 jails, prisons and juvenile facilities around the nation.  The 26th annual conference was held in Austin, Texas in early October.  Several members of AAPHP attended, both as board members and as participants in the program.  Dr. Mack, a former president of AAPHP, just completed his term as Chair of the NCCHC Board.  As a long term member of the Board, Dr. Mack has been a faithful attendee of the annual meeting bringing the message of public health to those who ply their profession behind prison walls.  As a result of Dr. Mack’s efforts and those of other PH physicians on the Board, the current Standards for Prisons and Jails include requirements that both institutions, in order to be accredited by NCCHC must demonstrate organizational linkages to their state or local PH departments.  The principle is that prisoners come from the community and will return to the community; the are the most medically impaired population in society carrying a large number of both infectious and chronic illnesses of public health importance.

 

The linkages between correctional systems and public health help to prevent disease transmission within the prison walls and on the outside upon release.  The PH skills of local and state professionals should be utilized within corrections.  The requirement that communication exists between the two improves both.  NCCHC has been at the forefront of this movement.

 

The conference in Austin, among other things emphasized the linkages between PH and the care of inmates.  Issues of suicide were discussed.  HIV/AIDS is always a topic of interest.  Hepatitis C, probably the most potentially devastating disease for prisons because of it overwhelming cost ($20.000 annually) to prison systems, received a great deal of discussion in the professional sessions.  Legal issues reflecting the constitutional aspects of correctional care was discussed by William Rold, an attorney from NYC who has argued several cases before the Supreme Court.  As questions of correctional health and bio-catastrophe enter the public health stage, some of what has been learned in the legal arena regarding correctional health care might be applicable to public health law.  The linkage is already there with regard to tuberculosis, and to a lesser degree with epidemic syphilis.  HIV/AIDS is still a conundrum in most jurisdictions.  And what to do with SARS patients, or smallpox still requires consideration.

 

For those of us in active, local or state public health, an occasional visit to the Annual Meeting of the NCCHC would be a worthwhile experience.  Several correctional physicians took out membership in AAPHP; those of us who work with prisons should consider reciprocating.

 

**********************

A Single Payer System and the Impact on Public Health

 

Jonathan Weisbuch, MD, MPH

 

An article by the Physicians Working Group in the August 13 edition of JAMA, [i] and accompanying editorials by Bindman and Haggstrom,[ii] and Fein, [iii] resurrect the debate on the nature of the US health care system.  A debate that has ebbed and flowed since Theodore Roosevelt and his Bull Moose Party ran on a platform supporting universal health coverage for all Americans, in 1912.  In that election the American Medical Association supported that position, and many of its members voted for Mr. Roosevelt and his party.  Nearly a century later, the current President of the AMA immediately denounced the proposal a Single Payer System by the Physicians’ Working Group as being inconsistent with AMA policy of “pluralism” and not worthy of debate since only 8000 physicians out of 600,000 in the nation signed in support of the article.  To address the many problems identified by the committee and by Fein, Bindman and Haggstrom, the AMA would patch the current system rather than revise the payment process for services rendered to patients by hospitals and physicians. 

 

The American Association of Public Health Physicians, a delegate member of the AMA House of Delegates, and an active specialty society speaking for all physicians engaged in public health practice, would disagree with the AMA, arguing that now is the time to reopen the discussion.  Public health physicians, responsible for the health of entire communities, see the problem from a different perspective than the average clinician. We face the failures inherent to the current medical care system on a daily basis.

 

If we are responsible for a public hospital and clinical service system serving the medically indigent, we serve a proportion of the 43 million Americans with no health insurance or with limited ability to pay for services.  The uninsured often have extraordinary acute and chronic care needs; they have received infrequent preventive services and limited early diagnostic work for their problems.  These patients enter the system only when very sick, entering through the hospital emergency departments.  Their work-up is expensive, often un-reimbursed, and additive to the grave financial strain on the hospital.  Patients with demonstrable clinical needs may not be denied service by an emergency department; and all the dunning in the world can not squeeze payment from the truly indigent who constitute up to thirty percent of patients requiring emergency care in public hospital emergency rooms.  The unpaid medical needs of these patients are driving the public hospital systems in this country deeper and deeper into debt.  Many have already closed, and more will follow to the detriment of the public’s health.

 

But public hospitals are not the only facet of the system crippled by the profit driven, pluralistic, chaotic American medical care system.  Private physicians, squeezed by large insurance plans, pressured to provide less service to more patients than in the past, are unable to meet the demands for care their patients require.  Faced with long scheduling delays for simple preventive procedures such as immunizations and unwilling to pay mounting co-payment fees, many insured individuals come to public health clinics established to serve the medically indigent. One third of patients served in the Maricopa County pre-school immunization clinics have insurance but choose the public clinic because their needs are not met by their HMO. The MCDPH has no mechanism to bill these individuals or their HMO; the public picks up another cost to cover the weakness of the current HMO based system.

 

Public health sees other failures from the inadequate coverage system. We identify the population groups that suffer infant mortality and other health problems at a higher rate than the  community at large.  These disparities, often two or three times the more favored populations in the same community, are linked to poverty, lack of education, and inadequate medical access. We see TB patients undiagnosed for weeks and months because they lack access to care. We see undocumented immigrants, unable to purchase drugs, lab services or prenatal during their pregnancy, entering the delivery room untested for many problems including syphilis; increasing the risk for congenitally infected infants. A Single Payer System for all members of the community, not linked to employment, indigency, age, or immigration status would simplify the system, assure all would be served in a timely manner, and enhance the chance that more individuals would receive the preventive services they deserve and clinical care early in the disease process.  Such a system would improve the health of individuals and the health status of the community.

 

Another population seen by public health but not by the traditional clinical community are jail and prison inmates.  Often from the poorest segment of society, prisoners have had limited access to care.  They carry a heavy burden of disease into the jail or prison, a burden that must be treated with public funds.  Prisoners are the one group in society with a constitutional right to receive quality medical care, [iv]  obligating the government to pay the cost.   Resources are frequently drawn from public health prevention programs to serve the needs of sick inmates.  A Single Payer System that guaranteed access to care for all those outside prison would lower the cost of care in prison, especially for the state and local governments that now must pay full cost for inmate care.

 

Public health physicians have seen their system ravaged during the past thirty years as public funding for community prevention has declined in part to pay for the rising cost of clinical services for prisoners, for the medically indigent under Medicaid, and for the support of the ailing public hospital system.  A Single Payer System could allocate a small proportion, say 2 to 3%, to the public health system yielding nearly $40 billion for federal, state and local public health departments. A Single Payer System would reduce the current administrative overhead of 30% ($400 billion) in the $1.4 trillion American health care system to the 5% to 10% characteristic of Medicare.  These savings would easily cover the 3% allocation to Public Health that would make that system whole. [v]    With 3% of the total health system funding, public health would be able to protect the nation from bio-catastrophe, natural or man made, respond to all its legislative mandates, and educate our successors in the bargain.

 

Today, nearly 60% of the health system is paid by federal, state or local government ($ 750 billion), [vi]the remainder by companies that choose to purchase employee health insurance (about 100 million Americans). Were a Single Payer System in place, with the Federal and State governments continuing to pay what they are now spending through general tax revenue and the Medicare deduction, most of the health care costs for the nation would be covered.  The amount industry pays could be rolled into their corporate income tax, and that would cover administrative overhead and other miscellaneous costs.  States and local governments would have adequate funding for public health because it would be part of the total package. Public health agencies would have the resources to build the appropriate infrastructure to be ready for any hazard that might befall the community, making the nation a safer place to live.

 

[1] The Physicians’ Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance, JAMA, 2003;290:798-805

[1] Bindman, AB, and Haggstrom, DA, “Small Steps or a Giant Leap for the Uninsured?” ibid

[1] Fein, R, “Universal Health Insurance – Let the Debate Resume,” ibid

[1] Estelle v. Gamble, etc.

[1] McGuinness, et al,  etc.

[1] Woolhandler, et al, June 2003.  The Federal Share of Health Care,





 

*********************************************************************

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AAPHP Leadership


PRESIDENT

Mary Ellen Bradshaw, MD

Phoenix, AZ

E-mail: mebmd@aol.com

VICE PRESIDENT

Alfio Rausa, MD, MPH

Greenwood, MS

Email: Alfio.Rausa@msdh.state.ms.us

PRESIDENT- ELECT

Arvind K. Goyal, MD, MPH

Rolling Meadows, IL

Email: arvindkgoyal@aol.com

SECRETARY

Camille Dillard, DO, MPH

Dolgeville, NY

E-mail: cdilldo@aol.com

TREASURER

John Poundstone, MD, MPH

Lexington, KY

Email: jpound@infionline.net

IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT

Dave Cundiff, MD, MPH

Olympia, WA

E-mail: cundiff@reachone.com

 

Note: The Board of Trustees includes all elected officers, editor of the Bulletin, the AMA delegate and the Immediate Past President.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Kathleen H. Acree, MD, JD, MPH

Sacramento, CA

 

Timothy Barth, MD, CCHP

Grand Rapids, MI

 

Franklyn Judson, MD, MPH

Denver, CO

 

 

Annette Kussmaul, MD, MPH

Mission, KS

 

Joshua Lipsman, MD, MPH

New Rochelle, NY

 

Perrianne Lurie, MD, MPH

Harrisburg, PA

 

Sindy Paul, MD, MPH

Yardley, PA

 

Stanley Reedy, MD, MPH

Ypsilanti, MI

 

Peter Rumm, MD, MPH

Madison, WI

 

Elizabeth Safran, MD, MPH

Atlanta, GA

 

Marc A. Safran, MD

Atlanta, GA

 

 

Ex officio members of the Board of Trustees:

C.M.G. (Kim) Buttery, MD, MPH

Urbanna, VA - AAPHP Webmaster

 

Douglas Mack, MD, MPH

Bethesda, MD – NCCHC Liaison,

Chair, PH Training/CCRC

 

Jean M. Malecki, MD, MPH

West Palm Beach, FL -ACPM Public Health Regent and AAPHP Liaison to ACPM

 

Joel L. Nitzkin, MD, MPH, DPA

New Orleans, LA - Chair, AAPHP Job Market Task Force and AAPHP Tobacco Task Force

 

Kevin Sherin, MD

Westmont, IL - Ethics Committee

AMA Delegate

Jonathan B. Weisbuch, MD, MPH

Phoenix, AZ

E-mail: jbweisbuch@earthlink.net

AMA Alternate Delegate

Mary Ellen Bradshaw, MD

Phoenix, AZ

Young Physician AMA Delegate

Cheryl Iverson, DO, MPH

Muskegon, MI

Young Physician AMA Alternate Delegate

 Vacant

Preventive Medicine Section Council Representatives

Peter Rumm, MD, MPH

Arvind Goyal, MD, MPH

Bulletin Editor

Mary Ellen Bradshaw, MD

Newsletter Editor

Virgina Dato, MD, MPH

Pittsburgh, PA

 

Address all correspondence to:

AAPHP

1300 W. Belmont Ave.

Chicago, Illinois  60657-3200

Phone (773) 832-4400

Fax (773) 880-2424

Email: aaphp@iname.com

Web: http://www.aaphp.org

 

ARE YOU GETTING AAPHP NEWS VIA EMAIL?  If not, we don’t have a valid email address for you.  Please send your correct email address along with your id number «ID» to AAPHP@iname.com.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

American Association of Public Health Physicians

The Voice of Public Health Physicians, Guardians of the Public's Health

Membership Application  

Name:______________________________________________________________    Title:_______________________________________

                (first)           (middle)               (last)                (degrees)

 

Address:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Telephone:_____________________________  Fax: ___________________________E-Mail:_____________________________________

 

I am a graduate of _______________________________________________ _________

                                                       (School of Medicine or Osteopathy)  (date)

 

I am currently: (circle all that apply) 1. a student   2. a resident   3. in active practice

(3a. academic   3b.administrative   3c.consultative)   4. retired   5.other

Current Member of AMA  (check one)   ____Yes     ____No

 

 Membership Category for 2004

 Dues

Residents/students/retired/reduced income

$30.00

Active Physicians

$75.00

 

For additional information check out our web site http://www.aaphp.org or contact AAPHP by email: aaphp@iname.com:  Phone (773) 832-4400   Fax (773) 880-2424

Join via the internet http://www.aaphp.org or Send this form with a check made out to AAPHP to:

 1300 W. Belmont Ave,  Chicago, Illinois  60657-3200